Enipedia is a small editorial operation with subject editors who own technical accuracy in their fields. Drafts are produced with assistance from large language models, then reviewed and corrected by a human editor with formal training in the relevant area before publication. Where claims involve numbers (capacity, emissions, dates) we cite primary sources directly on the page.
How we work
Each article follows a fixed editorial pipeline: research and draft → infobox / structured-data fill → source review → topical-editor sign-off → publication. After publication, articles are revisited when authoritative data changes (e.g. plant decommissioning, ownership change, IAEA PRIS update).
Editorial standards
- Accuracy. Quantitative claims are sourced to the operator, the national regulator, IAEA PRIS, the IEA, peer-reviewed literature or the EU Commission's open datasets.
- Neutrality. Encyclopedic tone; no advocacy, no commercial messaging.
- Clarity. Technical jargon is defined on first use; SI units throughout.
- Currency. Where data changes year-on-year, the date of the figure and the date of last review are stated.
- Attribution. Embedded images come from Wikimedia Commons or other compatibly-licensed sources, with author credit on the page.
Subject editors
Errata & contact
Spotted an error? Have a primary source to add? Write to contact@enipedia.org — corrections are acknowledged and incorporated promptly.